{"id":5123,"date":"2023-05-18T20:22:48","date_gmt":"2023-05-18T18:22:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bernhardschloss.de\/blog\/?p=5123"},"modified":"2023-05-18T20:22:48","modified_gmt":"2023-05-18T18:22:48","slug":"no-canvas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bernhardschloss.de\/blog\/no-canvas\/","title":{"rendered":"(No) Canvas"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Although I am usually posting in German it feels unpolite as my sources are in English.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I recently discovered the\u00a0Problem Framing Canvas<\/a>\u00a0of the Griffith Centre for Systems Innovation.
Very interesting and exciting \u2013 but not a canvas<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The setting is intelligent and picks up various concepts such as 5-Whys, Framing, How might we or working with hypothesis and validation \u2013 but it is is not a canvas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A canvas offers us room for projection. We can project our topic on a canvas. Here we are having disjoint single fields of a formula. Although the concept is still inspiring, it is not a canvas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Closest to a canvas ist he first box in the second row: Draw out the problem \u2013 create a rich picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yes, that ist the idea of a canvas. Fields on a canvas are just ledger lines. They want to help us to draw a picture, but here weh have a checklist or a survey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Still ok, but not a canvas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is there a relation between the Cynefin-diagram and working hypothesis? Why are we talking of 3 hyothesis? Not 2 or 5? This scheme seems to be arbitrarily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Within a canvas we do have the freedom to draw over ledger lines, move objectives or connect objects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So no canvas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But still a recommendation.<\/p>\n

<\/div>